Managing large amounts of complex product information is a very time consuming and complex task. Because product information needs to be accurate and consistent across multiple channels. Furthermore, rich media assets and compatibility and cross-sell relations between products need to be maintained. Thus, proper management of product data has obvious gains. Therefore, a management system to handle product information is really necessary for any brand owner and retailer. A Product Information Management (PIM) system helps to organize and standardize large amounts of data. Such PIM systems can also ensure the creation and distribution of quality data across different channels. Commercial, free, or open source PIM systems are already available in the market. Here, I only deep-dive into the open source PIMs, as open source solutions typically dominate the long-tail of a business-to-business market.
What are the most known open source PIMs? The three most-used open source PIM systems that offer an open source version in the market today are Pimcore, Akeneo, and AtroPim (TreoPim). Below, I give a brief analysis after testing the demo versions of the three systems.
Firstly, all three systems provide relatively similar features.
Among the compared PIM systems, Akeneo is the most popular given that it is used by many brands and retailers. However, the open source version has limitations in features. While the Enterprise edition allows adding different extensions, the cost depending on the number of channels, users, and storage the Enterprise edition could be around 35k to 40k euros yearly.
Compared to the others, Pimcore offers many more free features in its open source version. At the same time, the enterprise version costs around 20K euros yearly. Thus less than Akeneo’s. Furthermore, its Enterprise subscription provides SLAs, long term support, and certain extensions. Trainings are also provided in the paid version.
Lastly, AtroPim is a completely open source model. However, commercial extensions are available for additional features like completeness dashboard, adding PDFs, etc., which are a one-time payment. But, TreoPim is now going through a reorganization process and AtroPim is developing the PIM from now on. Consequently, their system is not very stable and the demo links and API documentation links give 404s.
Below, a feature by feature comparison of the three selected open source PIMs. All three are roughly based on the same LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP) tech stack, with some variations. Pimcore seems to be the truest open source solution, in the sense that the free community version is complete. And, through free or paid add-ons missing functionalities can be acquired. Similar to the setup of the amazingly successful WordPress ecosystem.
Feature | Pimcore | Akeneo | Treopim(Atropim) |
Bulk Import/Export | Yes | Yes in CSV/XLSX format | Via paid extension |
Multimedia support | Supports images, hotspot images, Pdfs and videos. | Demo version supports only a single image. However, Enterprise version supports other formats. | Demo version only supports images. Separate paid extensions are available that supports other multimedia formats. |
Product Preview | Yes | No | No |
APIs | API is deprecated but, Pimcore data-hub is offered for web services | Yes with good documentation. Product Access Manager (PAM) is offered as a separate system. | Yes, but unstable at the moment |
Mapping of products | Should be implemented as a separate function | Offered as an extension | Field mapping is possible but, needs to be done manually |
Roles | Can be set up | Defining roles is possible | Can be set up |
Data restriction | Possible according to roles | User level defines the data level access | Possible according to roles |
Permission at field level | Yes | Not possible at field level | Yes |
Flexible data model | Yes, relationships between entities can be defined | No | Yes, relationships between entities can be defined |
Custom fields | Possible | Yes | Yes |
Data quality and completeness | Data validation and quality reports are provided for ensuring data quality and completeness. Individual rules can be setup. | A completeness score is provided and the rules can be set up according to the individual company | Data quality and completeness is not provided but a paid extension is available |
Configurable dashboard | Can be set up | No | Can be set up |
Two factor authentication (2FA) supported | Yes | No, but a paid extension is available | No |
Open source | Most features are available for free | Very limited in features. The Enterprise version provides most common features. | Most features are free in the demo but some of them are not working. |
Technologies used | Javascript, PHP MySQL/Maria DB | PHP, HTML, CSS, Python, MySQL/ Maria DB | PHP, MySQL/Maria DB |
In conclusion, after the tests and my quick research about the three systems, all three are offering comparable features. Almost all the main features are covered by the open source version in Pimcore and therefore it is one of the best open source PIM options available in the market. The possibility of personalizing content without any need for third-party connectors is also a huge positive for Pimcore.
Although Akeneo is the most used PIM system it is very costly even if you only need a limited set of features. For example, Akeneo needs a connector to integrate when a new company wants to import data.
Finally, AtroPim is too unstable at the moment to consider as a serious competitor for the other two.
Of the three, only for Akeneo an Icecat connector is available. In case of an Icecat/PIM integration, please contact Iceshop.
About Unold AG Unold, established in 1966 and headquartered in Hockenheim, Germany, has a long…
Automation has become an essential component of online retailers’ success. With so many tools available,…
The world of technology is constantly evolving, and so is the data that describes it.…
For medium and large-scale businesses, e-commerce automation is absolutely essential. It can be incredibly challenging…
Mobile commerce has been steadily growing over the years and is projected to reach 43.4%…
Turkey's e-commerce market experienced a rebound in 2023, with online spending more than doubling compared…