Exploring Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Meta, and Claude

In the previous blog post titled Advancing AI Research: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT, Open-source Models – Tensor Flow, Falcon 40B and Falcon 7B, we explored ChatGPT and prominent open-source AI models. Continuing our exploration, this time, we compare ChatGPT with the leading subscription-based AI models.

The analysis covers the following AI models:

• Bard: Bard emphasizes having the freshest information as it actively pulls data from the internet. This real-time data retrieval makes it a perfect choice for staying up-to-date with the latest research.
• Bing Chat: Bing Chat is tailored for business applications and customer support. Microsoft powers it using a specialized dataset. This tuning enables Bing Chat to excel at handling specific queries and tasks, positioning it as a prime option for customer-focused interactions.
• ChatGPT: ChatGPT draws its knowledge from a diverse internet dataset, encompassing various subjects and conversational styles. With extensive training, it adeptly generates responses based on absorbed information.
• Meta: Meta prioritizes resource efficiency compared to ChatGPT by employing fewer parameters. This efficiency translates to AI-powered insights without the burden of heavy resource usage.
• Claude: Claude, the next-generation AI assistant by Anthropic, is the result of dedicated research into training helpful, honest, and harmless AI systems. It’s capable of performing a wide range of conversational and text-processing tasks while maintaining a high level of reliability and predictability.

Comparative Analysis

Below, you can find the outcome of our comparative analysis.

Marketing Text Comparisons

Below are examples of AI-generated marketing texts using competing models.

Outcome:

• ChatGPT demonstrates superior accuracy in comparison to Bard and Bing Chat.
• Both Bard and Bing Chat include a lot of unnecessary text, which makes proofreading time-consuming.

Style Guided Bullet Point Comparisons

Below are examples of AI-generated bullet points by competing AI models.

Outcome:

• ChatGPT demonstrates superior accuracy in comparison to Bard and Bing Chat.
• Both Bard and Bing Chat include a lot of unnecessary text, which makes proofreading time-consuming.

Conclusion

ChatGPT excels in generating accurate marketing text and bullet points, outperforming Bing Chat and Bard. Its advantage is further enhanced by the availability of GPT-3.5 for free, particularly in cases where proofreading is less critical. The preference leans toward ChatGPT for automated marketing content due to its user-friendly API, which makes it the top choice.

As the AI landscape rapidly evolves, the introduction of Claude AI in the US and UK stands as an intriguing development. This shift has implications for e-commerce and open-source projects, potentially reshaping technology usage. However, the importance of ethical considerations remains paramount in navigating this transformation responsibly.

Prakash Dagwal